In recent years, different organisations have developed data models that are gradually being adopted across the construction sector to facilitate data exchange and accelerate the digital transformation. In this article we will compare the two most prevalent approaches and consider the pros and cons of applying them on industry level. The first approach is the use of classification systems to digitise information about construction objects. The second alternative is Data Templates proposed by the standardisation bodies ISO and CEN for use in Building Information Modelling.
What is the most efficient way for managing properties and data templates? Let’s take a look and compare the two main options available – the good old Excel vs. tools specifically designed to facilitate the implementation of the above-mentioned standards, such as Cobuilder Define.
We are pleased to announce that Alexander MacNally has joined Cobuilder in his role as Regional Sales Manager to strengthen Cobuilder’s position in the Nordic region. Alexander has more than 25 years of experience in international sales in the Nordic market working primarily with technological solutions that enable growth and consolidation of businesses.
Cobuilder receives funding to create a digital tool for sustainable construction The Bulgarian subsidiary of the Norwegian company Cobuilder has been awarded a grant through [...]
Norwegian Home Builders’ Association is asking all members to request machine-readable product data from their suppliers
Norwegian Home Builders' Association is asking all members to request machine-readable product data from their suppliers In a letter sent out on November 4, the Norwegian Home Builders' Association asks all their member companies [...]